Основные термины. детерминанты выполнения работы (determinants of work performance)

детерминанты выполнения работы (determinants of work performance)

индивидуальная оценка выполнения работы (individual performance appraisal)

интервью в ходе оценки работы (performance appraisal interview)

обучение аттестующих (rater training)

оценка выполнения работы (performance appraisal)

оценка выполнения работы, основанная на поведении (behavior-based performance appraisal)

оценка, даваемая сослуживцами (peer appraisal)

подход к выполнению работы (performance management)

предрасположенность аттестующего (rater bias)

самооценка (self-appraisal)

сравнительная оценка выполнения работы (comparative performance appraisal)

электронный мониторинг работы (electronic performance monitoring)

Литература

Aiello, J. R., & Chomiak, A. (1992). The effects of computer monitoring and distraction on task performance. Unpublished manuscript.

Aiello, J. R., & Kolb, K.J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 339-353.

Ambrose, M. L, & Kulik, С. Т. (1994). The effect of information format and performance pattern on performance appraisal judgments in a computerized performance monitoring context. Journal (if Applied Social Psychology, 24, 801-823.

Aimick, B. C., &;: Smith, M. J. (1992). Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: A conceptual overview. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 6-16.

Aintonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349-356. ish, A. (1994). Participants' reaction to subordinate appraisal of managers: Results of a pilot. Public Personnel .Management, 23, 237-256.

Athey,T.R., &: Mclntyrc, R. M.(1987). Effect of rater training on rater accuracy: Levels of processing theory and social facilitation theory perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 567-572.

Auistin, J. Т., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917-1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77,836-874.

Avolio, B.J., Waldman, D. A., & McDanic!, M. A. (1990). Age and work performance in nonmana- gerialjobs: The effects of experience and occupation type. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 407-422.

Balzer, W. K. (1986). Biases in the recording of performance related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 329-347.

Balzcr, W. K., & Sulsky, L. M. (1992). Halo and performance appraisal research: A critical examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 975-985.

Banks, C. G., & Robcrson, L. (1985). Performance appraisers as test developers. Academy of Management Review, 10, 1.28-142.

Beer, M. (1987). Performance appraisal. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Benedict, M. E., & Levine, E. L. (1988). Delay and distortion: Tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 507-514.

Benson, P. G., Buckley, M. R., & Hall, S. (1988). The impact of rating scale format on rater accuracy: An evaluation of the mixed standard scale. Journal of Management, 14, 415-423.

Bernardin, H.J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). A consideration of strategies in rater training. Academy o/Managcment Review, 6, 205-212.

Bernardin, H. J., & Pence, E. C. (1980). Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 60-66.

Bernardin, H. J., & Smith, P. C. (1981). A clarification of some issues regarding the development and use of behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS), journal of Applied Psychology 66, 458- 463.

Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

Blanz, F., & Ghiselli, E. E. (1972). The mixed standard scale: A new rating system. Personnel Psychology, 2. 185-199.

Blumbcrg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The missing opportunity in organizational research: Someimplications for a theory of work performance. AcLiderr.'. o( Management Review, 7, 560- 569.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.). Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Brewer, N., Socha, L., & Potter, R. (1996). Gender differences in supervisors' use of performance feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 786-8A3,

Campbell, D. J., &: Lee, C. (1988). Self-appraisal in performance evaluation: Development versus evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 13. 302-314.

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1. 2nd ed.). Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists' Press.

Carayon, P. (1993). Effect of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Review of the literature and conceptual model. Human. Factors, 35, 385-395.

Ccderblom, D. (1982). The performance appraisal interview: A review, implications, and suggestions. Academy of Management Review, 7, 219-227.

Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 7-r. 130-135.

Collins, M. A., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (1995). The contributions of appearance to occupational outcomes in civilian and military settings. Journal of Applied 5ix»!>31 Psychology, 25,129-163.

Coward, W. M., & Sackctt, P. R. (1990). Linearity of ability-performance relationships: A reconfirmation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 297-300.

Cummings, L. L., & Schwab, D. P. (1973). Performance in organizations: Determinants and appraisals. Glenview, 1L: Scott, Foresman.

De Nisi, A. S., Randolph, W. A., & Blencoe, A. G. (1983). Potential problems with peer ratings. Academy of Management Journal. 26, 457_—464.

Dipboye, R. L., & dcPontbriand, R. (1981). Correlates of employee reactions to performance appraisals and appraisal systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 248-251.

Duarte, N. T, Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1993). How do 1 like thce? Let me appraise the ways. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 14, 239-249.

DuBois, C. L. Z., Sackett, P. R,, Zedcck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria: Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.

Dunnette, M. D., & Borman, W. C. (1979). Personnel selection and classification systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 477-525.

Farh.J. L, & Werbel.J. D. (1986). Effects of purpose of the appraisal and expectation of validation on self-appraisal leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 527-529.

Feild, H. S., & Holley, W. H. (1982). The relationship of performance appraisal system characteristics to verdicts in selected employment discrimination cases. Academy of Managcment Journal, 25, 392-406.

Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowland, K. M., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 101-135.

Finkelstein, L. M., Burke. M J., & Raju, N. S. (1995). Age discrimination in simulated employment contexts: An integrative analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80. 652-663.

Fisher, C. D. (1979). Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation, journal of Applied Psychology,64, 533-540.

Fisher, C. D. (1989). Current and recurrent challenges in HRM. Journal of Management, 15, 157- 180. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin. 51, 327-358.

Flynn, C. F., Sipes, W. E., Groscnbach, M. J., & Ellsworth, J. (1994). Top performer survey: Computerized psychological assessment in aircrew. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 65, A39-A44.

Flynn, G. (1995). Employee evaluations get so-so grades. Personnel Journal, 74. 21-22.

Fox, S., Caspy, Т., & Reisler, A. (1994). Variables affecting leniency, halo and validity of self-appraisal. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 45-56.

Fried, Y., & Ticgs, R. B. (1995). Supervisors' role conflict and role ambiguity differential relations with performance ratings of subordinates and the moderating effect of screening ability Journal of Applied Psychology 80, 282-291.

Furnham, A., & Stringfield, P. (1994). Congruence of self and subordinate ratings of managerial practices as a correlate of supervisor evaluation. Journal of Occupational and Op'gamzationa! Psychology, 67, 57-67.

Gallatin, L. (1989). Electronic monitoring in the workplace; Supervision or surveillance? Boston: Massachusetts Coalition on New Office Technology.

Gandz, J., & Murray, V. V (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 2.3,237-251.

George, D. I., & Smith, M. C. (1990). An empirical comparison of self-assessment and organizational assessment in personnel selection. Public Personnel Management. 19, 175-190.

Gioia, D. A., & Longnecker, С. О. (1994). Delving into the dark side: The politics of executive appraisal. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 47-58. 31en, R. M. (1990). Performance appraisal: An unnerving yet useful process. Public Personnel Management, 19, 1-10.

Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1988). Evaluating employee performance: Does the appraisal instrument make a difference? Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9, 155-172.

Hall, J. (1994). Americans know how to be productive if managers will let them. Organizational Dynamics, 22, 33-46.

Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta'-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41,43-62.

Harris, M. M., Smith, D. E., & Champagne, D. (1995). A field study of performance appraisal purpose: Research versus administrative-based ratings. Personnel Psychology, 48, 151-160.

Hassell, B. L, & Pcrrewe, P. L. (1995). An examination of beliefs about older workers: Do stereotypes still exist? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 76,457-468.

Hedge, J. W, & Kavanagh, M. J. (1988). Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: Comparison of three methods of performance appraiser training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 68-73.

Hencman, R. L., & Wexlcy, K. N. (1983). The effects of time delay in rating and amount of information observed on performance rating accuracy Academy of Management Journal, 26, 677-686.

Hunt, S. T. (1996). Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49. I

lgen, D. R., & Feldman, J. M. (1983). Performance appraisal: A process focus. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CTJAI.

Ilgen, D. R., Peterson, R. В., Martin, B. A., & Boeschcn, D. A. (1981). Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28,311-330.

Iancevich.J. M. (1979). Longitudinal study of the effects of rater training on psychometric error in ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64. 502-508. fudge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management journal, 36. 80-105.

Kane, J. S., Bcrnardin, H. J., Villanova. R. & Peyrefittc, J. (1995). Stability of rater leniency: Three studies. Academy of Management Journal, 38. 1036-1051.

Karl, K. A., & Wexiey, K. N. (1989). Patterns of performance and rating frequency: Influence on the assessment of performance. Journal of Management, 15, 5-20. Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science:. 9.131-146.

Kay, E., Meyer, H. H., & French, J. R. P. (1965). Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview. Journal of Applied Psychology. 49, 311-317.

Kingstrom, P. O., &: Bass, A. R. (1981). A critical analysis of studies comparing behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) and other rating formats. Personnel Psychology. 34, 263-289.

Kinicki, A. J., Horn. R W., Trost, M. R., & Wade, K. J. (1995). Effects of category prototypes on performance-rating accuracy, journal of Applied Psychology, 80. 354-370.

Klimoski, R., & Inks, L. (1990). Accountability forces in performance appraisal. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 5. 194-208.

Knauft, E. B. (1948). Construction and use of weighted checklist rating scales for two industrial situations. Journal of Applied Psychology 32. 63-70.

Kraiger. K. (1985). Analysis of relationships among self. peer, and supervisory ratings of performance. Prepublication report.

Kraiger, K., & Ford. J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of ratce race effects in performance ratings. Journal of .Applied Psychology, 70. 56-65. Landau, J. (1995). The relationship of race and gender to managers' ratings of promotion potential. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 16, 391-400.

Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin. 87, 72-107.

Latham, G. P., Fav, C., & Saari, L. M. (1979). The development of behavioral observation scales for appraising the performance of foremen. Personel Psychology, 32, 299-311.

Latham, G. P. & VVexley, K. N. (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal. Reading, M A: Addison-Wesley. Lawrence, B. S. (1988). New wrinkles in the theory of age: Demography norms, and performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31. 309-337.

Lazer, R. L, & Wikstrom, W. S. (1977). Appraising managerial performance: Current practices and future directions. New York: The Conference Board. Mabc, P. A., III., & West, S. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and mctaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 280-296.

Mager, R. F. & Pipe. P. (1970). Analyzing performance problems or «You really oughta wanna!» Belmont, C. A: Fearon. Maroncy, B. P. &: Buckley, M. R. (1992). Does research in performance appraisal influence the practice of performance appraisal? Regretfully not Public Personnel Management, 21.185-196. Martell, R. F. & Borg, M. R. (1993). A comparison of the behavioral rating accuracy of groups and individuals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78. 43-50.

Maurer, T. J., Palmer, J. K., & Ashe, D. K. (1993). Diaries, checklists, evaluations, and contrast effects in measurement of behavior. Journal of Apphcd Psychology. 78, 226-231.

Maurer, T, Steilberg, C., & McCoyJ. (1991). Effects of reviewing prior performance information immediately before subsequent evaluations. Presented at the 99th convention of the American

Psychological Association. San Francisco. Maurer, T. J., & Taylor, M. A. (1994). Is sex by itself enough? An explanation of gender bias issues in performance appraisal. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 6C. 231-251. McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P. & Cudcck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79, 493-505.

McEvoy, G. M. (1990). Public sector managers' reactions to appraisals by subordinates. Public Personnel Management, 19, 201-212.

McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P E (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisals in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40, 785-797.

McNeely, В. L, & Meglino, В. М. (1994). The role ofdispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of the intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79. 836-844. Meyer, H. H. (1991). A solution to the performance appraisal feedback enigma. Academy of Management Executive, 5, 68-76.

Miner, J. B. (1988). Development and application of the rated ranking technique in performance appraisal. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 291-305.

Mitchell, T. R., & Kalb, L. S. (1981). Effects of outcome knowledge and outcome valence on supervisors' evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 604-612.

Mitchell, T. R., & Liden, R. C. (1982). The effects of social context on performance evaluations. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance. 29, 241-256.

Moravec, M., Juliff, R., & Heslec K. (1995). Partnerships help a company manage performance. Personnel journal, 75, 104-108.

Murphy, K. R., Gannett, B. A., Herr, B. M., & Chen, J. A. (1986). Effects of subsequent performance on evaluations ot previous performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 427-431.

Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 218-225.

Murphy, K. R., & Reynolds, D. H. (1988). Docs true halo affect observed halo? Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 235-238.

O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. A. (1994). Working smarter and harder: A longitudinal study of managerial success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 603-627. Ostroff, C. (1993). Rater perceptions, satisfaction and performance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 345-356.

Pearce.J. L., & Porter, L. W. (1986). Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 211-218. Peters, L. H., & O'Connor, E. J. (1980). Situational constraints and work outcomes: The influence of a frequently overlooked construct. Academy of Management Review, 5, 391-397.

Piotrowski, M. J., Barnes-Farrcll, J. L., & Esrig, E. H. (1989). Bchaviorally anchored bias: A replication and extension of Murphy and Constans. Joural of Applied Psychology, 74, 823-826.

Posdakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351-363.

Pulakos, E. D. (1984). A comparison of rater training programs: Error training and accuracy training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 581-588.

Quinones, M. A., Ford.J. K., &c Teachout, M. S. (1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual and meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 887- 910.

Reilly, R., Henry, S., & SmitherJ. (1990). An examination of the effects of using behavior checklists on the construct validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology, 43. 71-84.

Riggio, R. E., &c Cole, E. J. (1992). Agreement between subordinate and superior ratings of supervisory performance and effects on self and subordinate job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 151-158.

Ross, J., & Ferris, K. R. (1980). Interpersonal attraction and organizational outcomes: A field examination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 617-632.

Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78,450-462.

Sackett, R. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73. 482-486.

Sanchcz J. 1., & De La Torre, P. (1996). A second look at the relationship between rating and behavioral accuracy in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81. 3-10.

Schellhardt. T. D. (1996, Nov. 19). It's time to evaluate your work, and all involved are groaning. Wall Street Journal, pp. Al. 5.

Schoorman, F D. (1988). Escalation bias in performance appraisals: An unintended consequence of supervisor participation in hiring deci.sions. Journal of Applied Psychology. 73. 58-62.

Schrader, B. W, & Steiner, D. D. (1996). Common comparison standards: An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 813-820.

Shepherd, R. J. (1995). A personal perspective on aging and productivity, with particular reference to physically demanding work. Ergonomics. 38, 617-636.

Shore, L. N., & Thornton, G. C., 111. (1986). Effects of gender on self- and supervisory ratings. Academy of Management Journal. 29,115-129.

Sidanius, J., & Crane, M. (1989). Job evaluation and gender: The case of university faculty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19, 174-197. Simonson, I., & Nye, P. (1992). The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 51. 416-446.

Smith, M. J., Caravan, P., Sanders, K. J., Lim, S-Y, & LcGrande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Applied Ergonomics. 23, 17-28.

Smith. R C., & Kendall, L. M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology 47. 149-155.

Smither.J. W., Wohlers, A.J., & London, M. (1995). Afield study of reactions to normative versus individualized upward feedback. Group and Organization Management. 20, 61-89. Solomon, R. J. (1990). Developing job specific appraisal factors in large organizations.

Public Personnel Management, 19, 11-24.

Stamoulis, D. Т., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (1993). Rater training and rating accuracy: Training for dimensional accuracy versus training for ratee differentiation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78,994-1003.

Stanton.J. M., & Bamcs-FarrellJ. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 738-745.

Steel, R. R, Mento, A. J., & Hcndrix, W. H. (1987). Constraining forces and the work performance of finance company cashiers. Journal of Management. 13. 473-482.

Steiner, D. D., Rain.J. S., & Smalley, M. M. (1993). Distributional ratings of performance: Further examination of a new rating format. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 438-442.

Sterns, H. L., & Miklos, S. M. (1995). The aging worker in a changing environment: Organizational and individual issues. Journal of Vocational Behavior 7, 248-268.

Sulsky, L. M., & Day D. V. (1994). Effects of framc-of-referencc training on rater accuracy under alternative time delays. Journal of Applied Psychology 79. 535-543.

Sumer, H. C., & Knight, R A. (1996). .Assimilation and contrast effects in performance ratings: Effects of rating the previous performance on rating subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8.1, 436-442.

Taylor, M. S., Tracy, К В., Renard, M. K., Hamson, J. K., & Carrol, J. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, W. 495-523.

Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21, 739-757.

Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings, journal of Applied Psychology. 4. 25-29.

Thornton, G. C., 111.(1980). Psychometric properties of self-appraisals of job performance. Personnel Psychology. 33, 263-271.

Tsui, A. S., & Barry, B. (1986). Interpersonal affect and rating errors. Academy of Management Journal, 29. 586-599.

Tziner, A., & Latham, G. R (1989). The effects of appraisal instrument, feedback, and goal-setting on worker satisfaction and commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, JO, 145-153.

Van Scotter, J. R., & Motovvidio, S.J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of comextual performance, journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 525-531.

Varca, P. E., & James-Valutis, M. (1993). The relationship of ability and satisfaction to job performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 265-275.

Villanova,P., Bernardin, H.J., Dahmus, S. A., & Sims, R. L. (1993). Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 789-799.

Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L, & Ones, D. S. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.

Waldman, D. A., & Avolio, B. J. (1986). A meta-analysis of age differences in job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 33-38.

Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232-260.

Werner, J. M. (1994). Dimensions that make a difference: Examining the impact of in-role andextrarole behaviors on supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 98-107.

Williams, J'. R., & Levy, P. E. (1992). The effects of perceived system knowledge on the agreement between self-ratings and supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 45, 835-847.

Woehr, D.J.(1992). Performance dimension accessibility: Implications for rating accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior; 0,357-367.

Woehr, D. J., & Feldman, J. (1993). Processing objective and question order effects on the causal relation between memory and judgment in performance appraisal: The tip of the iceberg. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 232-241.

Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189-205.

Wyer,R. S. Jr., & Srull, Т. К. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. R Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Zajonc, R. B. (1965, July 16). Social facilitation. Science, pp. 269-274.

Zalesny, M. D. (1990). Rater confidence and social influence in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 274-289.

Zalesny, M. D., & Kirsch, M. P. (1989). The effect of similarity on performance ratings and interrater agreement. Human Relations, 42, 81-96.

Zammuto, R. E, London, M., & Rowland, К. М. (1982). Organization and rater differences in performance appraisals. Personnel Psychology, 35, 643-658.