The main notions of grammar: a lexeme, a grammeme, grammatical meaning, grammatical form, a paradigm.

In the language system each unit is included into a set of connections based on different properties. For example the word-forms

Child, children, child’s, children’s

have the same lexical meaning, so they constitute a lexeme. The grammatical meaning of the word runs, expressed by the suffix –s, unites this word with walks, stands, sleeps, skates, lives and a great many other words into a group we shall call a grammeme

From the previous examples it is clear that a word like runs containing a lexical and a grammatical morpheme is at the same time a member of a certain lexeme and of a certain grammeme. In a lexeme the lexical morpheme may be regarded as invariable (at least in content) and the grammat­ical morphemes as variables. In a grammeme, on the con­trary, the grammatical morpheme is invariable and the le­xical morphemes are variables. As we see, each word of a lexeme represents a certain grammeme, and each word of a grammeme represents a certain lexeme,

The system of all grammatical forms( grammemes) of all lexemes of a given class constitute a paradigm (e.g. парадигма множественного числа существительного).

The grammatical meaning (of plurality, of the past tense, of the passive voice) is a very general abstract meaning. It is not confined to an individual word. It is expressed by special grammatical forms. (For example boys, children, phenomena, teeth, mice). The grammatical meaning depends on the lexical meaning and is connected with objective reality in most cases indirectly, that is why we may say that the grammatical meaning is relative; it is revealed by at least two forms opposed to one another.

Speak – speaks (third person singular).

Speak – spoke (past indefinite tense)

The grammatical meaning is obligatory, it must be expressed in speech if the speaker wants to be understood properly. The grammatical meaning must have a form of expression (inflexions, analytical form, word order, intonation). Let’s compare the word-forms walks – is walking. Both denote process, but only the second form expresses it grammatically, with the help of the continuous tense.

The term ‘form’ may be used in a wide sense to denote all means of expressing grammatical meaning, or in a narrow sense – to denote the means of expressing a particular grammatical meaning (plural number, present tense, possessive case). Grammatical forms may play a vital role in our ability to lend variety to speech, to give "colour" to the subject or evaluate it and to convey the information more emotionally. ( You are being naughty today.)

2. The Word and the Morpheme

The term morpheme is one of the central notions of grammatical theory. The morphemedenotes the smallest meaningful unit into which a word-form may be divided. E. g. the word writers can be divided into 3 morphemes. 1- writ- expresses the basic lexical meaning of the word, 2- er denotes an agent who performs the action , 3-es shows that more than one person is meant. The morpheme is built up by phonemes, and the shortest morphemes include only one phoneme. (ros-y. move-d).

Two or more morphemes may sound the same but be basically different, i.e. they may be homonyms. (-er – indicating the doer of the action and the comparative degree of the adjective).

There may be Zero morphemes, that is the absence of a morpheme may indicate a certain meaning (the absence of the morpheme –s in the word book shows that it is a singular form.

Morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words.. They are represented in speech by morphs. Most morphemes are realized by single morphs like in the word kind-ness. Some morphemes may be manifested by more than one morph according to their position. Such alternative morphs are called allomorphs, e.g. boys (z), caps (s) benches (iz), oxen (n).

The morpheme is only identified as a part of the word. So its function is constituent.

The word, as different from the morpheme, is a naming unit of language. It names things and their relations. The word may be described as the basic unit of language. Words are built up by morphemes, the shortest words consist of one morpheme.

Being the central element of any language system, the word is studied by different subjects – lexicology, phonology, morphology, syntax, and even philosophy and psychology. As a result there exist many definitions of the term “word”, they are specific for each field of study and are considered one-sided by the representatives of all other domains (область знаний). But in our practice we experience no difficulty in separating one word from another. Still most scholars agree to the following definition: the word is a nominative unit of the language formed by morphemes, which enters the lexicon of the language as its elementary component used for the formation of the sentence with other nominative elements.

The word has a double nature: it is material because it can be heard or seen and it is immaterial as far as its meaning is concerned. The material aspect is its form and the other one is its meaning, or content. When used in actual speech it may occur in different word-forms, different syntactic functions and signal various meanings.

The main features of words are isolatability (a word may become a sentence), uninterruptibility (a word is not easily interrupted by a parenthetical expression as a sequence of words may be); a certain loosenessin reference to the place in a sequence.

3. The structure of words. Types of morphemes.

Morphemes as meaningful components of words are divided into root morphemes (roots) and affixal morphemes (affixes: prefixes, suffixes, infixes, inflexions). A word has at least one morpheme. The roots are obligatory and express the meaning of the word. They are also called free morphemes as they can occur as a separate word. Affixes are not obligatory, they are called bound morphemes as they can not form words by themselves.

Applying meaning and the function as two traditional criteria for the classification of morphemes, they are traditionally divided into lexical, lexical-grammatical (or word-building), and grammatical (or form-building) affixes. Lexical-grammatical, or derivational morphemes show that the word belongs to a certain part of speech. Form-building affixes, or inflexions, as a rule have no lexical meaning or function, but have a distinct grammatical meaning. Sometimes an inflexion can acquire a lexical meaning (colour – colours –флаг).

According to the positional criterion, i.e. the place of an affix relating to the root, we distinguish prefixes (enable), suffixes (capable), infixes (feet) and sometimes postfixes which follow the inflexion.

It should be noted that there is some confusion in the use of the terms suffix and inflexion. We may consider the term suffix in a wide sense and apply it to any morpheme following the root, whether it is derivational or inflexional. But there is a point of view according to which the term "inflection" (or "ending") is applied to any morpheme serving to derive a form of a word and having no lexical meaning. So the morphemes characterizing the infinitive, for instance, in Russian or German, will be termed inflec­tions.

According to another view, the term "inflection" (or "ending") is only applied to morphemes expressing case and number in nom­inal parts of speech, and to those expressing person and number in verbs. From this viewpoint the morpheme characterizing the in­finitive in Russian or German or the morpheme characterizing the gerund in English would not be an inflection or ending, whereas the morpheme -s in forms like writes, buys, would be one.

We will apply the term "inflection" to every morpheme serving to derive a grammatical form and having no lexical meaning of its own.

Sometimes the grammatical meaning of the word can be expressed by the absence of a morpheme. So the meaningful absence of the morpheme is called a zero-morpheme.

The function of the morpheme can be performed by a separate word. In the verb form “will do” the meaning of the future is expressed by the word WILL. It is a contradictory unit. Formally it is a word, functionally it is a morpheme. As it has the features of a word and a morpheme, it is called a word-morpheme, or a semi-bound morpheme .

Words without their grammatical morphemes (often called endings or inflections) are known as stems. A stem may consist of the root alone, as in the words table, red,, moved, or it may be more complicated, as in enlarge, removable, importance. In accordance with their structure the following four types of stems are usually distinguished:

- Simple, containing only the root, as in day, dogs, write, wanted, etc.

- Derivative, containing affixes or other stem-building elements, as in boyhood, rewrite, strength, speech (cf. speak), transport, etc.

- Compound, containing two or more roots, as in white­-wash, pickpocket, apple tree, motor-car, brother-in-law, etc. The stems of blue-eyed, lion-hearted, etc. are both compound and derivative and are sometimes called compound derivatives'.

- Composite, containing free lexico-grammatical word-morphemes or otherwise having the form of a combination of words, as in give up, two hundred and twenty-five, at last, in vain.

A word is not just a com­bination of morphemes. Apart from the naming power that unites all the morphemes of a word like revolutionary and turns them into a higher unit, they are also united by the word-stress which is an essential part of the structure of a word. If we assume that the verb stem transport- has been derived from the noun stem transport-, we have to count stress change among the stem-building elements of the verb.

4. Different means of form-building (Synthetic and analytical grammatical forms.)

The grammatical forms are classed into synthetic and analytical. Synthetic grammatical forms are realized by the inner morphemic composition of the word, while analytical forms are built up by a combination of at least two words, one of which is a grammatical auxiliary and the other is a word with its proper lexical meaning. Synthetic grammatical forms are built on inner inflexion, outer inflexion and suppletivity.

- inner inflexion is used in English in irregular verbs to form participle II and in some nouns for the formation of the plural. (take – took, tooth – teeth – vowel interchange)

- suppletivity is used in the forms be, go, in the irregular forms of the degrees of comparison, in some forms of personal pronouns. (be-am-are; go-went; good-better, bad-worse, much-more, we-us).

These 2 way of form -building are unproductive in Modern English.

- outer inflexion (affixation) is a productive means of affixation. It is used to build a lot of grammatical forms of nouns, verbs, comparison forms (goes, finished, easier etc.).

We may find a combination of different ways of form-building in one word. E.g.: the stem boyish- has been derived from the stem boy- by adding the suffix -ish, remove- from move-by means of the prefix re-. In such cases we speak of stem-building by affixation. But affixation is not the only means of stem-building in English. The stem of the noun strength has been derived from the stem of the adjective strong not only by affixation (the suffix -th) but also by vowel change .

Analytical forms include a word-morpheme and a notional element (is writing, has done). Analytical forms are contradictory units, they are phrases in form and words in function. In the analytical form has fulfilled the auxiliary verb has is lexically empty. It expresses only the grammatical meaning of the 3d person singular. The notional element expresses both the lexical and the grammatical meaning – participle II. So the grammatical meaning is expressed by the 2 components of the analytical form: the auxiliary verb has and the suffix –ed. They constitute a discontinuous morpheme (прерывающийся). There are several criteria of their recognizing:

1. A total grammatical meaning is built on the basis of a word combination of all components of the form; the auxiliary element has a more particular meaning of person and number, but the total meaning of time, voice, modality, etc. comprises all components together. Each component in isolation doesn’t possess the information about the total meaning of the given form.

2. Among the components of the analytical form there are no syntactic relations.

3. Syntactic relations are possible for the whole form in total with its surroundings in a sentence

e.g. in the word-group ‘was driving the car’ the element the car is a complement to the whole form..

4. Analytical forms are correlated with synthetic forms. There must be at least one synthetic form in the paradigm. Analytical forms have developed from free phrases and there are structures which take an intermediate position between free phrases and analytical forms:

e.g. will go; more beautiful.

5. Auxiliary elements loose their lexical meaning and can be contracted.

The abundant use of analytical forms, especially in the system of the verb, is the characteristic feature of modern English.

5. Grammatical category . Types of opposition.

The most general meanings rendered by language and expressed by systematic correlations of word-forms are interpreted in linguistics as categorical grammatical meanings. The categorical meaning unites the individual meanings of the correlated paradigmatic forms (e.g. sing - plural) and is exposed through them (Bloch).

A grammatical category is a unity of a special grammatical form and a special grammatical meaning. It can also be defined as a certain grammatical meaning which is expressed by a grammatical form. A grammatical category is a grammatical form expressing a special grammatical meaning. The grammatical category is the same in the similar forms of different words.

A grammatical category includes no fewer than two opposed forms but bigger amount is possible (plural – singular; present – past – future; active – passive; nominative - possessive). There are no categories that have only one form.

There is a special scientific method to reveal the existence of grammatical categories in languages. It is called the method of binary oppositions. To establish a category we must find at least two grammatical forms which are opposed to each other on the principle of having or not having certain distinctive features. Thus any opposition consists of two or more parts. The part which is characterized by the form of the special meaning is called strong, or marked, we use the sign (+) here. The part having no distinctive features is called weak, or unmarked. We employ the sign (-) in this case.

-Make – makes+

The weak part is usually the starting form in the paradigm. There are oppositions in which both members of the opposition are marked +works - is working+

Being contrasted, the two forms reveal a grammatical category: boy – boys (number)

Go – went (tense) Built – was built (voice).

In the example table – tables the members of the opposition differ in form and have different grammatical meaning (table – singularity, tables - plurality). At the same time they express the same general grammatical meaning, that of number. The unity of the general meaning and its particular manifestation which is revealed through the opposition of forms is a grammatical category.

Oppositions may be of three main types:

- Privative(указывающий на отсутствие чего-либо). The marked member has a narrow definite meaning, while the unmarked member has a wide general meaning.

One member in this opposition has a certain distinctive feature, it is called marked, or strong.

- equipollent – равноценный.

Both members of the opposition are marked (am - is)

- gradual – последовательный.

Members of this opposition differ by the degree of certain quality (good – better - best).